Possible Recall 2002-2007?

Discussion in 'KJ General Discussion' started by Jaber, Jun 4, 2013.

  1. profdlp

    profdlp On The Ledge

    Messages:
    4,849
    Likes Received:
    120
    Joined:
    May 21, 2013
    Location:
    Westlake, Ohio
    Took me more time to scrape that stupid sticker off than all the rest of it combined. :gr_grin:
     
  2. Birdman330

    Birdman330 Full Access Member

    Messages:
    667
    Likes Received:
    14
    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Location:
    Des Moines, Iowa
    I got lucky mine wasn't really stuck on there so I peeled it right off, after I was told it got ''misplaced'' as I had requested.
     
  3. Em96

    Em96 New Member

    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Location:
    Saugerties
    I heard something about that. I got papers in the mail saying that they would install a tow hitch in those models to protect from impact on the tanks in case of an accident. Idk how much that actually helps.
     
  4. CzarKJ

    CzarKJ Full Access Member

    Messages:
    2,604
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Location:
    Townsend, MA
    From LOW SPEED impacts that hit just the hitch yes. High speed doesn't matter. Also the tank is still mostly unprotected without a fuel tank skid plate anyways.
     
  5. uss2defiant

    uss2defiant Full Access Member

    Messages:
    3,317
    Likes Received:
    20
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2014
    Location:
    Tucson, Arizona
    at least go do it and get your gift card. I think they're giving visa cards out to get people to do the hitch recall.
     
  6. tommudd

    tommudd Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    17,260
    Likes Received:
    205
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Location:
    Southeastern Ohio
    My 04 still doesn't have one, again total BS
     
  7. LibertyTC

    LibertyTC Well-Known Member Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    166
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Location:
    B.C. Canada
    I wonder if they would have to hold a general meeting to name this mount..:icon_lol:
    [​IMG]
     
  8. Hockeygoon

    Hockeygoon Full Access Member

    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Location:
    Manhattan Kansas
    Agreed.

    The hitch doesn't help at all. It was something dreamed up in a meeting with Ray LaHood and Chrysler officials when the government was demanding a fix to the exposed gas tank problem. My understanding was no studies or tests were done before the "fix" was quickly agreed to by Chrysler as it was by far the cheapest option. It sounds like it was something suggested as a possible fix during the meeting and by the end of the meeting it was agreed to be "the fix". Problem is even the ones with this "hitch" are still bursting into flames in low speed accidents.


    Chrysler, Jeep recall from gas tank fires still raising safety concerns - CBS News
     
  9. tommudd

    tommudd Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    17,260
    Likes Received:
    205
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Location:
    Southeastern Ohio
    Its not if the hitch does anything its the BS that they even are doing anything. The KJ met all standards when it was built , so few fires have been reported that its not really worth discussing. Only in the auto industry does such stupid things exist.
     
  10. Hockeygoon

    Hockeygoon Full Access Member

    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Location:
    Manhattan Kansas
    Did it? Industry standard at the time had removed the fuel tank from the rear on all other makes. The Cherokee was to industry standards but the Liberty and Grand Cherokee continued with the fuel tank in an exposed position long after ever other manufacturer had moved it. Besides Jeep/Dodge the last rear mount fuel tank I can think of was the Bronco - dropped in 1996. At least it had a real frame, real bumper and a shield to protect it.
     
  11. tommudd

    tommudd Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    17,260
    Likes Received:
    205
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Location:
    Southeastern Ohio
    Yes it did at the time
    and I'll continue to say its all BS, lawyers etc are making the money on this deal
     
  12. Hockeygoon

    Hockeygoon Full Access Member

    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Location:
    Manhattan Kansas
    Who else was building a vehicle with a rear mounted fuel tank?
     
  13. Leeann

    Leeann Full Access Member

    Messages:
    2,280
    Likes Received:
    50
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Location:
    Maryland
    Irrelevant. It wasn't required by law. The fuel tank met all applicable safety standards in place at the time.

    Also, the vehicle doesn't burst into flames in low-speed accidents. It explodes under high-speed conditions. The accident they kept mentioning during the negotiations happened at 60 mph.
     
  14. Hockeygoon

    Hockeygoon Full Access Member

    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Location:
    Manhattan Kansas
    You think industry standards are set by law?

    Very relevant - why do you suppose all other manufacturers had quit using rear mount fuel tanks? Their cars had a tendency to catch fire in rear end accidents. In the 1970s Ford was sued over them and paid millions, then in the late 1980s early 1990s Chevy was sued over them and paid over a billion. WTF was Chrysler thinking? Didn't they read the papers?

    The industry standard was set - don't use rear mount fuel tanks unless you want to be sued. Apparently they wanted to be sued.
     
  15. profdlp

    profdlp On The Ledge

    Messages:
    4,849
    Likes Received:
    120
    Joined:
    May 21, 2013
    Location:
    Westlake, Ohio
    Why do you own a Liberty and post on a Liberty forum if you hate them so much? That's like moving to Paris and complaining about all the French people. Are you a masochist? :mexsmoke:
     
  16. Hockeygoon

    Hockeygoon Full Access Member

    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Location:
    Manhattan Kansas
    Why do people have a problem with honest conservation?
     
  17. Hockeygoon

    Hockeygoon Full Access Member

    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Location:
    Manhattan Kansas
    If you didn't have contact with the French why would you complain about them?
     
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2016
  18. tjkj2002

    tjkj2002 Full Access Member

    Messages:
    10,613
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere between being sane and insane!
    During the time in question?


    Ford,GM,Toyota,and Izuzu just to name a few besides Chrysler.




    Oh and the '07 KJ with a rear mounted gas tank passed the stricter crash tests which forced all others to move the gas tank forward.They changed to tests again a few years ago which they are trying to use against Jeeps made years before the new standards.
     
  19. tommudd

    tommudd Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    17,260
    Likes Received:
    205
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Location:
    Southeastern Ohio
    I don't have an issue with honest, good , practical conservation ,
    heck my Grandfather and I were practicing it back in the 70s, plowing on the curvature of the land on our farm. We also created many acres into wildlife habitat during that time.

    But now back to the gas tank conversation
    I think the term of industry standards is some what misleading
    who sets the so called industry standards and then everyone is suppose to follow?
    The KJs met all rules and regs set at that time and I still think its foolish to make any auto manufacturer go back and rebuild an automobile 5-10-15 years later
     
  20. Hockeygoon

    Hockeygoon Full Access Member

    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Location:
    Manhattan Kansas
    What models?