Fumoto oil drain valve

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

67Customs

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
659
Reaction score
2
Location
North Carolina
I'd like to know as well. Been thinking of switching to one.

More specifically, anyone with skid plates running one?
 

first&lastKJ

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
1,214
Reaction score
127
Location
Indiana
I posted this in the wrong forum, should have posted in general discussion. I was looking for a product review on the Fumoto valve when I posted this.
But anyway I think it would be ok as long as you don't do any serious offroading. It would be alot cleaner and quicker to change the oil.
 

Lancer

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
287
Reaction score
0
Location
South East London
I have, and I have the skid row plates as well. Works well - makes oil changes a lot easier and less messy with no risk of thread stripping.
 

tjkj2002

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2006
Messages
10,612
Reaction score
39
Location
Somewhere between being sane and insane!
I'll through my 2 cents in.............

Being a tech you do not want to do a oil chnage on a vehicle with one of those valves installed.The chances of failure are to great to take any chances with my job.Plus they drain so slowly and time is money.
 

67Customs

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
659
Reaction score
2
Location
North Carolina
I'll through my 2 cents in.............

Being a tech you do not want to do a oil chnage on a vehicle with one of those valves installed.The chances of failure are to great to take any chances with my job.Plus they drain so slowly and time is money.
What specific failures happen with these valves?
 

67Customs

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
659
Reaction score
2
Location
North Carolina
Well when your job's on the line chnages your whole perspective.
I'm sorry. I just assumed when you said, "The chances of failure are to great...," that you had facts about the valve that I hadn't read before. No just, "time is money."

I personally haven't heard of any valve failures and the design looks pretty simple.

Also, I would assume that since these valves (seeing that there doesn't seem to be many, if any, documented failures) are pretty safe to use, they would be nice for you mechanics. Instead of you reaching for your wrench to loosen a bolt and possibly having trouble removing it because the last person that touched it doesn't believe in torque specs, you simply lift and turn a handle to open the valve. It would seem to me that there would be less failures with these. I've heard a lot of people complain about stripped oil pan bolts, but no Fomoto failures. I would also take into account the time for cleaning off the oily bolt before re-install and possibly for looking for a dropped bolt. There are no chances of those two instances with the valve.

Lastly, I can't see how this valve diminishes the oil flow that much seeing as how most vehicles that come in are at or near operating temp when you change it. The fact that the oil is at a thin viscosity at the point of the change, I would tend to think that a minimal diameter reduction in the outlet would only create nominal flow restrictions, in turn not significantly increasing the time it takes the pan to empty.

Just some thoughts.
 

tjkj2002

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2006
Messages
10,612
Reaction score
39
Location
Somewhere between being sane and insane!
I'm sorry. I just assumed when you said, "The chances of failure are to great...," that you had facts about the valve that I hadn't read before. No just, "time is money."

I personally haven't heard of any valve failures and the design looks pretty simple.

Also, I would assume that since these valves (seeing that there doesn't seem to be many, if any, documented failures) are pretty safe to use, they would be nice for you mechanics. Instead of you reaching for your wrench to loosen a bolt and possibly having trouble removing it because the last person that touched it doesn't believe in torque specs, you simply lift and turn a handle to open the valve. It would seem to me that there would be less failures with these. I've heard a lot of people complain about stripped oil pan bolts, but no Fomoto failures. I would also take into account the time for cleaning off the oily bolt before re-install and possibly for looking for a dropped bolt. There are no chances of those two instances with the valve.

Lastly, I can't see how this valve diminishes the oil flow that much seeing as how most vehicles that come in are at or near operating temp when you change it. The fact that the oil is at a thin viscosity at the point of the change, I would tend to think that a minimal diameter reduction in the outlet would only create nominal flow restrictions, in turn not significantly increasing the time it takes the pan to empty.

Just some thoughts.
The oil flow coming out is about 1/4 of what it would be by removing the pan plug,more so if on a vehicle like a Subaru.Those valves are simple but no real stops to keep them from turning on there own,and there plenty lubricated.There are not many in use,well not many that come into a shop at least.

I look at it as the pan plug is less likely to fail then a valve is.One oil out and your looking for another job around here and paying for a new engine.Just not going to take that chance.With the comment "time is money" it's all so very true if your a tech.Unless you don't like making money to pay bills and feed yourself then those valves are no issue but when you only get paid 18mins to do a oil change you must beat that time or match it to make money.Going over and your loosing money.
 

67Customs

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
659
Reaction score
2
Location
North Carolina
My other thought is that most people who buy and install these are the DIY type. I wouldn't expect people who own these to take their vehicles to an oil change business.

At any rate, I'm pretty sure I'm going to purchase one. I'm about 2,500 miles away from my 60k service. While I'm changing everything else, I think I'm going to add one of these.
 

first&lastKJ

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
1,214
Reaction score
127
Location
Indiana
I'm about 2,500 miles away from my 60k service. While I'm changing everything else, I think I'm going to add one of these.[/QUOTE]

Let us know if you like it, I may get one as well.
 

kidjedi

New Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Location
Denver, CO
My other thought is that most people who buy and install these are the DIY type. I wouldn't expect people who own these to take their vehicles to an oil change business.

At any rate, I'm pretty sure I'm going to purchase one. I'm about 2,500 miles away from my 60k service. While I'm changing everything else, I think I'm going to add one of these.

So how'd it go? I just ordered mine.

I'll through my 2 cents in.............

Being a tech you do not want to do a oil chnage on a vehicle with one of those valves installed.The chances of failure are to great to take any chances with my job.Plus they drain so slowly and time is money.

Though I would trust tjkj2002 with most anything on my vehicle (going from his posts on the boards), I think the Fumoto valve is more likely to be a benefit, as it keeps nitwit techs (not you, tjkj2002! :) ) from stripping out your oil pan... and I've definitely read about THAT problem many, MANY more times than a Fumoto valve failing (which I've never even heard of).

All that said, it seems like the valve is for people who are going to change their own oil anyway... no worry about confusing a tech!
 

cplchris

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
804
Reaction score
10
Location
Albany, NY
putting a device on your vehicle designed to drain it of any lubricant with less effort than a few turns of a wrench is like having a coin operated self destruct mechanism between the seat and center console, or a medical device that drains all of your blood with the push of a button. its a bad idea.
 

jinstall

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
128
Reaction score
1
Location
ElPaso, TX and Germany
And what facts do you have to back this up?

Because he facts show that it is more likely to strip a drain plug that for the Fumto valve to fail. At $500 for a new oil pan not including installation, the valve is a much more safer and cost effective alternative.
 

cplchris

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
804
Reaction score
10
Location
Albany, NY
common sense shows that if you fear stripping the threads on an oil pan with a regular drain plug i wouldnt want you touching shit on my vehicle, more moving parts=more opportunities for failure, the easiest thing to remember in order to keep from breaking shit is "tight is tight, too tight is broke", i have never seen or heard of someone stripping the threads out on their oil pan, i have seen people with a drain valve leak oil randomly and not know it until serious damage was done, and where are you getting a price of 500 for an oil pan??? and where are you getting statistics and records showing more failures on a plug than on a valve???? fumotos website?
 

kidjedi

New Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Location
Denver, CO
i have never seen or heard of someone stripping the threads out on their oil pan, i have seen people with a drain valve leak oil randomly and not know it until serious damage was done, and where are you getting a price of 500 for an oil pan??? and where are you getting statistics and records showing more failures on a plug than on a valve???? fumotos website?

As mentioned earlier, I have seen a LOT of posts from people with stripped oil pan plugs, and some pretty detailed posts on what one has to go through to replace the oil pan. I have not read one single report of a problem with the Fumoto valve.

I follow your logic, and it seems solid, but the evidence points in another direction. I'm pretty sure the point of this thread was to find out from real world experience if the Fumoto is a good idea (and, from the original poster, if the valve works with skid plates in place), and from literally everything I've seen, the stories are all "pro Fumoto," with lots of stories of stripped drain plugs and replacing oil pans to go along with the reasoning.

I'm new to the vehicle, and thus have no experience... but I am trying to learn from other people's experiences, and this is simply what I've found.
 

cplchris

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
804
Reaction score
10
Location
Albany, NY
How many of those stripped drain pans are people who followed maintenance procedures how they should have? How many are people who overtightened the drain plug multiple times and did not replace the sealing crush washer when the change the oil? Or did they just keep tightening the drain plug to crush the washer more and more??? I have had my jeep for 4 years and plenty of other vehicles and ive never had any drain plug issues, why add another part to replace something that hasnt failed???
 

jinstall

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
128
Reaction score
1
Location
ElPaso, TX and Germany
You must be registered for see images attach


You mean these crush washers? Yeah some of us don't replace them or keep a dozen or so on hand. Some of us don't keep service records either.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Attachments

  • ImageUploadedByTapatalk1361667701.950328.jpg
    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1361667701.950328.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 2

Latest posts

Members online

Top