K&N Cold Air Intake

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

gamble

New Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Location
South Dakota, USA
So right now I am definitely more tempted than ever in purchasing a K&N CAI. Are they worth it for a 2003 3.7L Jeep Liberty? Right now they are 20% off where im looking at getting them, and am so tempted to pull the trigger and get one. Any insight is much appreciated. Oh. and is the performance after installation noticeable?
 

tjkj2002

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2006
Messages
10,612
Reaction score
39
Location
Somewhere between being sane and insane!
I read somewhere that the response time, as well as the power seemed to increase. Is that not true?

For a race only vehicle yes,a stock daily driver is a big NO.

Also lets more dirt into the engine for faster wear and you can not take advantage of the increased airflow without internal engine modifications.

Stick with the stock box,that is actually a true cold air intake were the K&N system is actually a hot air intake by sucking hot underhood air in.
 

JavelinAMX

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Location
Western MA
why not just buy a drop in K&N or Mopar Performance filter? one big plus in my eyes is that they are washable and reuseable.
 

04Liberty

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
1,293
Reaction score
79
Location
MD
If you want increased throttle you should and increased power you should go with a Fastman throttle body.



Not worth the expense without cams and heads modifications to increase the need for it.
 

tommudd

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Messages
22,456
Reaction score
3,643
Location
Southeastern Ohio
why not just buy a drop in K&N or Mopar Performance filter? one big plus in my eyes is that they are washable and reuseable.

and allow more dirt in

Best setup as far as air flow into the engine is the stock box with a good paper filter like one from Napa Gold. Great filter, does a good job of filtering out dirt etc.
You maybe able to wash the K&Ns but that is their ONLY saving grace, otherwise junk
 

tommudd

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Messages
22,456
Reaction score
3,643
Location
Southeastern Ohio
Not worth the expense without cams and heads modifications to increase the need for it.

So right, many of these so called mods people do to the KJs do nothing at all since they need cams, headers, pistons, B&G reflash etc to even take advantage of more air like the larger TBs give you
 

JasonJ

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
1,521
Reaction score
51
Location
Michigan
Volumetric efficiency people. A 3.7L displacement engine with the CFM flow rate of our cylinder heads, cannot flow more air than what the stock box/intake tube is already capable of.

You can add a 90mm throttle body and have NO air filter, any engine can only suck in as much as it can and that is a fixed amount at max capacity. Won't do any good beyond that.

There are a few formulas to calculate air flow. Take our 3.7L, making max hp at 5200rpm as the example.

Using V = (RPMxCID)/3456 x(VE), and figuring 80% VE (Volumetric efficiency), we get a max CFM of 271.783.

So putting ANY component in the intake or exhaust tract that outflows that number, is completely unnecessary and excessive. Example, suppose the K&N "cold air" intake claims that it flows 500cfm. Yeah? So what. The engine can only move 272CFM of air. No gains to be had.

Throttle bodies and carburetors are the same way. Putting a 650CFM Holley carb on your 350 chevy that only flows a calculated 421CFM is stupidly overkill. A 500CFM is better suited. Obviously cylinder head porting and valve sizing, as well as forced induction changes things (namely, the VE of the engine).

So keep that in mind when shopping for intakes and exhaust headers.
 

CactusJacked

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
2,407
Reaction score
11
Location
Chicago Suburbs
Good point, except our 3.7 flows a maximum of 303.4 cfm based on a ve of 80%, not 271.... You use maximum engine rpm (redline @ 5800) in the equation, not down lower where it makes max hp. The engine keeps pumping more air as the rpm's increase, regardless of where the max hp level is.
 

JasonJ

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
1,521
Reaction score
51
Location
Michigan
Good point, except our 3.7 flows a maximum of 303.4 cfm based on a ve of 80%, not 271.... You use maximum engine rpm (redline @ 5800) in the equation, not down lower where it makes max hp. The engine keeps pumping more air as the rpm's increase, regardless of where the max hp level is.

That is true. I purposely used the max hp rpm as I felt that realistically in a real-world driving scenario, revving the engine past that rpm does very little in terms of increasing acceleration. Perhaps I am mistaken, but that was my thinking.

I mean, crap, I rarely rev my KJ past 3000 in normal driving.
 

CactusJacked

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
2,407
Reaction score
11
Location
Chicago Suburbs
Go on youtube and search cold air intakes mythbusted. When dyno tested, the cold air intakes and the drop in K&N filter did no better than the stock air box with a paper filter, some actually performed worse.
 

krisP

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Messages
483
Reaction score
0
Location
NY/PA
i know some run an extra tube from stock air box to grill. Same concept ?
 

CactusJacked

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
2,407
Reaction score
11
Location
Chicago Suburbs
The guys that did the CAI vs stock box comparison on a 225 hp car, got a little over 1% increase in h.p. (oooooh) by extending the intake tube and putting the cone filter to the front of the car. More cooler incoming air can't hurt, but you're not going to feel any difference.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top